A polarização política brasileira e os efeitos (anti) democráticos da democracia deliberativa

Mauricio Martins Reis, Catharine Black Lipp João

Resumo


O presente artigo pretende analisar os efeitos da deliberação coletiva com polarização política sob os ideais moral e epistêmico da democracia deliberativa. Serão abordadas as teorias sobre o comportamento intergrupal e a influência da polarização sobre os indivíduos e os grupos, para então serem examinados os pressupostos da democracia deliberativa e a sua prática na dinâmica do Tribunal do Júri. O método científico envolve uma abordagem indutiva, com pesquisa explicativa e com procedimento bibliográfico.

Palavras-chave


Conflito intergrupal; Deliberação coletiva; Democracia Deliberativa; Polarização de grupo; Tomada de decisão

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


ABRAMSON, Jeffrey. We, the jury. the jury sistem and the ideal of democracy: with a new preface. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 2000

ALMEIDA, Marco Rodrigo. Ascensão de Bolsonaro sela a crise de legitimidade dos partidos, diz pesquisador. Folha de São Paulo, 8 out. 2018.

BALLIET, Daniel; WU, Junhui; DREU, Carsten De. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psycological Bulletin, Washington, v. 140, n. 6, p. 1556-1581, 2014.

BOHM, Robert; RUSCH, Hannes; BARON, Jonathan. The psychology of intergroup conflict: a review of theories and measures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Amsterdam, 2018

BOWLES, Samuel. Conflict: altruism’s midwife. Nature, London, v. 456, nov. 2008.

CAMPBELL, Donald. Introduction to the wesleyan edition. In. SHERIF, Muzafer; HARVEY, O.J.; et. al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: the robbers cave experiment. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1988.

COHEN, Joshua. Reflections on habermas on democracy. Ratio Juris, Hoboken, v. 12, n. 4, p. 385-416, dez. 1999

ELLSWORTH, Phoebe C. Are twelve heads better than one? Law Quadrangle Notes, Ann Arbor, v. 38, n. 2, p. 56-64, 1995.

ESSES, Victoria; DOVIDIO, John; et. al. Social psychology of prejudice: historical and modern perspectives on group competition. In. CRANDALL, Christian; SCHALLER, Mark. (Org.) Social psychology of prejudice: historical and contemporary issues. Lawrence: Lewinian Press, 2004.

ESTABAN, Joan Maria; RAY, Debraj. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society Econometric Society, Chicago, v. 62, n. 4, p. 819-851, jul. 1994

ESTABAN, Joan Maria; SCHNEIDER, Gerald. Polarization and conflict: theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Peace Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 45, n. 2, p. 131-141, 2008

GLOWACKI, Luke; WILSON, Michael; WRANGHAM. The evolutionary antropology of war. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Amsterdam, 2017.

HABERMAS, Jurgen. Direito e democracia. entre facticidade e validade, volume I. Tradução: Flávio Beno Siebeneichler. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997

HANS, Valerie P.; VIDMAR, Neil. Judging the jury. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 1986

HEATH, Chip; GONZALES. Rich. interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Amsterdam, v. 61, n. 3, p. 305-326, mar. 1995

HEWSTONE, Miles; JASPARS, Joseph. Social dimensions of attribution. In. TAJFEL, Henri (Org.). European studies in social psychology. the social dimension, volume 2. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984

HUGHES, Brent L.; AMBADY, Nalini; ZAKI, Jamil. Trusting outgroup, but not ingroup members, requires control: neural and behavioral evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Oxford, v. 12, n. 3, p. 372–381, 2017.

KALVEN, Harry; ZEISEL, Hans. The american jury. Boston: Little Brown, 1966

KASSIN, Saul; WEIGHTSMAN, Lawrence. The american jury on trial: psychologial perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2013

MCDOOM, Omar Shahabudin.The psychology of threat in intergroup conflict: emotions, rationality, and opportunity in the rwandan genocide. International Security, Cambridge, v. 37, n. 2, p. 119-155, 2012

NIÑO, Carlos Santiago. La constitución de la democracia deliberativa. Gedisa: Barcelona, 1997.

PARSONS, Bryan. The social identity politics of peer networks. American Politics Research, Eastleigh v. 43, n. 4, p. 680-707, 2015

Placar do impeachment. Estadão. 2016. Disponível em . Acesso: 29 dez. 2018

SANDERS, Lynn M. Against deliberation. Political Theory, Thousand Oaks, v. 25, n. 3, p. 347-376, jun. 1997.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. Capitalism, socialism & democracy. London: Routledge, 2003

SHERIF, Muzafer; HARVEY, O.J.; et. al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: the robbers cave experiment. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1988

SOMIN, Ilya. Deliberative democracy and political ignorance. Critical Review, New York, v. 22, n. 2-3, p. 253-279, 2010

STEPHAN, Walter; STEPHAN, Cookie White. An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In. Oskamp, S. (Org.). Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000

SUMNER, William Graham. Folkways. a study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston: The Athaenaeum Press, 1906.

TAJFEL, Henri. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psycology, Palo Alto, v. 33, p. 1-39, 1982.

TALISSE, Robert. New trouble for deliberative democracy. Les ateliers de l'éthique, Montréal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 107-123, 2017

TURNER, John. Rediscovering the social group: self-categorization theory. Oxford: Oxford, 1987

WAYTZ, Adam; YOUNG, Liane; GINGES, Jeremy. Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Fairfax, v. 44, p. 15687-15692, nov. 2014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2019.v5i1.5426

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.