Trayendo el Neo-Institucionalismo al Primer Plano: Una Oportunidad para una Mayor Relación Entre la Ciencia Politica y el Derecho
Barra lateral de artigos
Publicado:
dez 1, 2016
Palavras-chave:
Teoría Política, Neo-Institucionalismo, Instituciones Formales e Informales
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
El artículo analiza un conjunto no exhaustivo de teorías políticas de alcance medio en varios campos del conocimiento de la ciencia política y su conexión con la disciplina del derecho. El objetivo es argumentar como el reciente giro neo-institucionalista en la ciencia política es una excelente oportunidad para una mayor relación entre ambas disciplinas.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Detalhes do artigo
Como Citar
BUSQUETS, José Miguel; CARNEIRO, Fabricio. Trayendo el Neo-Institucionalismo al Primer Plano: Una Oportunidad para una Mayor Relación Entre la Ciencia Politica y el Derecho. Conpedi Law Review, Florianopolis, Brasil, v. 2, n. 4, p. 259–274, 2016. DOI: 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2016.v2i4.3664. Disponível em: https://indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3664. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2024.
Seção
Artigos
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) emhttp://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Referências
BRASIL de Lima Jr, O. Instituciones Políticas Democráticas. O segredo da legitimidade. Jorge Zahar Editor, 1997.
BUSQUETS, J. M.. Análisis Comparado de las Reformas de la Seguridad Social en el Cono Sur y Bolivia. (1981-1995), LAPZUS, 2005.
DINIZ, E. Governabilidade, Democracia e Reforma do Estado: Os Desafíos da Construcao de uma Nova Orden no Brasil dos Anos 90. en O Desafío da Democracia na América Latina, IUPERJ, 1996.
DREWRY, G. Las instituciones políticas: enfoques jurídicos en Nuevo Manual de Ciencia Política. Tomo I.Istmo, 2001.
FUKUYAMA, F. La Construcción del Estado. Hacia un nuevo orden mundial en el siglo XXI. SINE QUA NON, 2004.
GARGARELLA, R. Latin American constitutionalism, 1810-2010: the engine room of the Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2013.
GEDDES, B. Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America. En: A. Lijphart y C. Waisman (eds.), Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996, p. 15-42.
HALL, P y TAYLOR, R. Political Science and the Three New Institucionalisms, Polical Studies, vol. 44, núm. 5. 1996, p. 936-957.
HARTLYN, J. Normative and Empirical Perspectives on Constitutionalism and Presidentialism. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 57, Núm. 4, 2015, p. 143-151.
HELMKE, G. and S. LEVITSKY. Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. JHU Press, 2006.
HUNTINGTON, S. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven e Londres, Yale University Press, 1968.
HUBER, E. RAGIN, C. y STEPHENS, J. Social Democracy, Cristian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and The Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology, 1993, p. 711-749.
-------------. Welfare Reform in Latin America: Comparative Perspectives, paper Prepared for the Conference on Social Policies for the Urban Poor in Latin America. Welfare Reform in a Democratic Context. Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, September 12-14, 1997.
------------- .Development and Crisis of Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
IMMERGUT, E. The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland and Sweden. In Thelen & Steinmo, eds. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
KATO, J. Review Article: Institutions and Rationality in Politics- Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalist, British Journal Political Science, vol.26, núm. 04, 1996, p. 553-582.
KORPI, W. Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies. A Preliminary Comparative Framework. West European Politics Vol. 3, núm. 3, 1980, p. 296-316.
MAHONEY, J. and K. THELEN, eds. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
MAHONEY, J. and K. THELEN, eds. Advances in comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
MAYNTZ, R. El Estado y la sociedad civil en la gobernanza moderna. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia No 21, 2001, p. 7-22.
NEGRETTO, G. L. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
NORTH, D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
O'DONNELL, G. Illusions about consolidation. Journal of democracy, Vol. 7, Núm. 2 1996, p. 34-51.
O´DONNELL, G. Contrapuntos: ensayos escogidos sobre autoritarismo y democratización. Paidós, 1997.
PASQUINO, G. Naturaleza y evolución de la disciplina en Manual de ciencia política. Alianza Editorial, 1996.
PETERS, B. G. Institutional Theory in Political Science. The “New Institutionalism”, Londonand New York:CassellAcademic, 1999.
PIERRE, J. Debating Governance. Oxford University Press, 2000.
PUTNAM , R. Comunidade e democracia: a experiencia da Italia moderna. Fundacao Getulio Vargas, 1996.
SCHMIDT, V. Discourse institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11, Núm. 1, 2008, p. p.303.
SHUGART, M. The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politician´s Constitutional Choices. British Journal of Political Science Vol.28, 1998, p. 1-29.
SKOCPOL, T. Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of analysis in Current Research en EVANS, P., RUESCHEMEYER, D. y SKOCPOL, Th. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
STEPHENS, J.D. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, London: Macmillan, 1979.
TSEBELIS, G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parlamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism en British Journal of Political Science, 1995.
WEAVER, R. K. and B. A. Rockman. Do institutions matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. The Brookings Institution, 1993.
WILENSKY, H. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Root of Public Expenditures. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975.
WILENSKY, H. y JOHANNSON, G. Leftism, catholicism and democratic corporatism: the rol of political parties in recent Welfare State development. En: FLORA, P. y A.J. HEIDENHEIMER (eds). The Development of Welfare State in Europe and America, Transaction Books, Princeton. 1981.
WORLD BANK. Governance and Development, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1992.
BUSQUETS, J. M.. Análisis Comparado de las Reformas de la Seguridad Social en el Cono Sur y Bolivia. (1981-1995), LAPZUS, 2005.
DINIZ, E. Governabilidade, Democracia e Reforma do Estado: Os Desafíos da Construcao de uma Nova Orden no Brasil dos Anos 90. en O Desafío da Democracia na América Latina, IUPERJ, 1996.
DREWRY, G. Las instituciones políticas: enfoques jurídicos en Nuevo Manual de Ciencia Política. Tomo I.Istmo, 2001.
FUKUYAMA, F. La Construcción del Estado. Hacia un nuevo orden mundial en el siglo XXI. SINE QUA NON, 2004.
GARGARELLA, R. Latin American constitutionalism, 1810-2010: the engine room of the Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2013.
GEDDES, B. Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America. En: A. Lijphart y C. Waisman (eds.), Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996, p. 15-42.
HALL, P y TAYLOR, R. Political Science and the Three New Institucionalisms, Polical Studies, vol. 44, núm. 5. 1996, p. 936-957.
HARTLYN, J. Normative and Empirical Perspectives on Constitutionalism and Presidentialism. Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 57, Núm. 4, 2015, p. 143-151.
HELMKE, G. and S. LEVITSKY. Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. JHU Press, 2006.
HUNTINGTON, S. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven e Londres, Yale University Press, 1968.
HUBER, E. RAGIN, C. y STEPHENS, J. Social Democracy, Cristian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and The Welfare State. American Journal of Sociology, 1993, p. 711-749.
-------------. Welfare Reform in Latin America: Comparative Perspectives, paper Prepared for the Conference on Social Policies for the Urban Poor in Latin America. Welfare Reform in a Democratic Context. Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, September 12-14, 1997.
------------- .Development and Crisis of Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. The University of Chicago Press, 2001.
IMMERGUT, E. The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland and Sweden. In Thelen & Steinmo, eds. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
KATO, J. Review Article: Institutions and Rationality in Politics- Three Varieties of Neo-Institutionalist, British Journal Political Science, vol.26, núm. 04, 1996, p. 553-582.
KORPI, W. Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies. A Preliminary Comparative Framework. West European Politics Vol. 3, núm. 3, 1980, p. 296-316.
MAHONEY, J. and K. THELEN, eds. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
MAHONEY, J. and K. THELEN, eds. Advances in comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
MAYNTZ, R. El Estado y la sociedad civil en la gobernanza moderna. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia No 21, 2001, p. 7-22.
NEGRETTO, G. L. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
NORTH, D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
O'DONNELL, G. Illusions about consolidation. Journal of democracy, Vol. 7, Núm. 2 1996, p. 34-51.
O´DONNELL, G. Contrapuntos: ensayos escogidos sobre autoritarismo y democratización. Paidós, 1997.
PASQUINO, G. Naturaleza y evolución de la disciplina en Manual de ciencia política. Alianza Editorial, 1996.
PETERS, B. G. Institutional Theory in Political Science. The “New Institutionalism”, Londonand New York:CassellAcademic, 1999.
PIERRE, J. Debating Governance. Oxford University Press, 2000.
PUTNAM , R. Comunidade e democracia: a experiencia da Italia moderna. Fundacao Getulio Vargas, 1996.
SCHMIDT, V. Discourse institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11, Núm. 1, 2008, p. p.303.
SHUGART, M. The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politician´s Constitutional Choices. British Journal of Political Science Vol.28, 1998, p. 1-29.
SKOCPOL, T. Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of analysis in Current Research en EVANS, P., RUESCHEMEYER, D. y SKOCPOL, Th. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
STEPHENS, J.D. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism, London: Macmillan, 1979.
TSEBELIS, G. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parlamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism en British Journal of Political Science, 1995.
WEAVER, R. K. and B. A. Rockman. Do institutions matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. The Brookings Institution, 1993.
WILENSKY, H. The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Root of Public Expenditures. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975.
WILENSKY, H. y JOHANNSON, G. Leftism, catholicism and democratic corporatism: the rol of political parties in recent Welfare State development. En: FLORA, P. y A.J. HEIDENHEIMER (eds). The Development of Welfare State in Europe and America, Transaction Books, Princeton. 1981.
WORLD BANK. Governance and Development, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1992.