A PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA SOBRE A APLICAÇÃO DA HIPÓTESE DE PORTER ENTRE OS ANOS DE 2000 A 2015
Barre latérale de l'article
Publiée :
déc. 1, 2017
Mots-clés :
Hipótese de Porter, Sustentabilidade, Inovação, Regulamentação Ambiental
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
A presente pesquisa objetiva analisar a aplicação da Hipótese de Porter e sua relevância na inovação empresarial em decorrência das legislações ambientais evidenciados nos artigos disponíveis na Base Ebsco entre os anos de 2000 a 2015. A pesquisa caracteriza-se como levantamento bibliográfico exploratório, por proporcionar aos pesquisadores maior contato com o assunto pesquisado. Para tanto foi desenvolvido uma pesquisa na Ebsco de agosto a novembro de 2015 e posteriormente foram analisados 82 artigos de diferentes Instituições de Ensino e países. Verificou-se que apesar de ser muito criticada a hipótese consegue atingir seu objetivo nos mais diversos setores, entretanto a maioria das pesquisas concentra-se no setor industrial.
Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Details de l'article
Comment citer
FUJIHARA, Hillary Lapas; SILVA, Elizandra da; BERTOLINI, Geysler Rogis Flor. A PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA SOBRE A APLICAÇÃO DA HIPÓTESE DE PORTER ENTRE OS ANOS DE 2000 A 2015. Revista de Direito Brasileira, Florianopolis, Brasil, v. 18, n. 7, p. 282–300, 2017. DOI: 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3205. Disponível em: https://indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3205. Acesso em: 20 déc. 2024.
Numéro
Rubrique
PARTE GERAL
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) emhttp://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Références
ALPAY, E.; BUCCOLA, S.; KERKVLIET, J. Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 84, n.4, 887-901, 2002.
AMBEC, S.; BARLA, P. A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, n. 75, p. 355-360, 2002.
AMBEC, S.; COHEN, M. A.; ELGIE, S.; LANOIE, P. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: con environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Environmental Economics and Policy. v. 7 n. 1 p. 2-22, jan., 2013.
ANDRÉ, F. J.; GONZÁLEZ P.; PORTEIRO, N. Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 57, p. 182-194, 2009.
ANSANELLI, S. L. de M. Exigências ambientais europeias: novos desafios competitivos para o complexo eletrônico brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 10, n. 1, jan./jun., 2011.
ANTONIOLI, D.; MANCINELLI, S.; MAZZANTI, M. Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organizational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, v. 42, p. 975-988, 2013.
AQUINO, S. R. F. de; CAVALHEIRO, L. P. R.; PELLENZ, M. A tutela jurídica da água no Brasil: reflexões a partir dos direitos da natureza. Revista de Direito Brasileira – RDB, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 6, p. 65-79, maio/ago., 2016.
ASHFORD, N. A. Na innovation-based strategy for a sustainable environment. In: J. Hemmelskamp, K. Rennings, F. Leone (org.). Innovation-oriented environmental regulation: theoretical approach and empirical analysis. New York: ZEW Economic Studies, 2000, p. 67-107.
BATES, T.; ROBB, A. Analysis of young neighnorhood firms serving urban minority clients. Journal of Economics and Business, v. 60, p. 139-148, 2008.
BERNARD, S. Remanufacturing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 62, n. 3, p. 337-351, 2011.
BRÄNNLUND, R.; LUNDGREN, T. Environmental policy and profitability: evidence from Swedish industry. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, v. 12, p. 59-79, 2010.
BROBERG, T.; MARKLUND, Per-Olov; SAMAKOVLIS, E.; HAMMAR, H. Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 40, p. 43-56, jan., 2013.
BURNETT, R. D.; HANSEN, D. R.; QUINTANA, O. Eco-efficiency: achieving productivity improvements through environmental cost management. Accounting and the Public Interest, v. 7, n. 1, p. 66-92, 2007.
CALIENDO, P.; MUNIZ, V. Política fiscal e desenvolvimento tecnológico-empresarial: uma análise crítica sobre inovação e tributação. Revista de Direito Brasileira – RDB, São Paulo, v.12, n. 5, p. 155-172, 2015.
CERIN, P. Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: a discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, v. 56, p. 209-225, 2006.
COLLINS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
CONNELLY, J.; LIMPAPHAYOM, P. Environmental reporting and firm performance: evidence from Thailand. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, v. 13, p. 137-149, 2004.
COSTANTINI, V.; CRESPI, F. Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics, v. 68, p. 447-460, 2008.
COSTANTINI, V.; MAZZANTI, M. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, v. 41, n.1, p. 132-153, 2012.
DOGANAY, S. M.; SAYED, S.; TASKIN, F. Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering? Energy Economics, v. 44, p. 340-349, 2014.
FEICHTINGER, G.; HARTL, R. F.; KORT, P. M.; VELIOV, V. M. Environmental policy, the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: effects of learning and technological progress. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 50, p. 434-446, 2005.
FORD, J. A.; STEEN, J.; VERREYNNE, M.-L. How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 84, p. 204-2013, 2014.
FRANCKX, L. Regulatory emission limits for cars and the Porter Hypothesis: a survey of the literature. Transport Reviews, v. 35, n. 6, p. 746-766, 2015.
FROHWEIN, T.; HANSJÜRGENS, B. Chemicals regulation and the Porter hypothesis: a critical review of the new European chemicals regulation. Journal of Business Chemistry, v. 2, n. 1, p. 19-36, jan., 2005.
GILL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
GREAKER, M. Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 52, p. 411-420, 2006.
GROBA, F. Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the Porter Hypothesis? Applied Economics, v. 46, n. 5, p. 503-526, 2014.
HAMAMOTO, M. Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, v. 28, p. 299-312, 2006.
HORBACH, J. Determinants of environmental innovation - new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, v. 37, n.1, p. 163-173, 2008.
HORVÁTHOVÁ, E. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: short-term costs and long-term benefits. Ecological Economics, v. 84, p. 91-97, 2012.
INOUE, E.; ARIMURA, T. H.; NAKANO, M. A new insight into environmental innovation: does the maturity of environmental management systems matter? Ecological Economics, v. 94, p. 156-163, 2013.
JAFFE, A.B.; PALMER, K. Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Economics and Statistics, v. 79, p. 610-619, 1997.
KATARIA, M. The role of preferences in disagreements over scientific hypothesis: evidence on cognitive bias in formation of beliefs. The Journal of Socio-Economics, v. 41, n. 4, p. 364-369, 2012.
KÓZLUK, T.; ZIPPERER, V. Environmental policies and productivity growth – a critical review of empirical findings. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, v. 88, p. 1-37, nov., 2013.
KRIECHEL, B.; ZIESEMER, T. The environmental Porter Hypothesis: theory, evidence and a model of timing of adoption. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, v. 18, n.3, p. 267-294, 2009.
LANOIE, P.; PATRY, M.; LAJEUNESSE, R. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Poductivity Analysis, v. 30, p. 121-128, 2008.
LANOIE, P.; LAURENT-LUCCHETI, J.; JOHNSTONE, N.; AMBEC, S. Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 803-842, 2011.
LIM, S.; PRAKASH, A. Voluntary regulations and innovation: the case of ISO 14001. Public Administration Review, v. 74, n. 2, p. 233-244, 2014.
LINDMARK, M.; BERGQUIST, A. K. Expansion for pollution reduction? Environmental adaptation of a Swedish and a Canadian metal smelter, 1960-2005. Business History, v. 50, n. 4, p. 530-546, 2008.
LIU, X.; DAI, H.; CHENG, P. Drivers of integrated environmental innovation and impact on company competitiveness: evidence from 18 Chinese firms. Journal of Technology and Globalisation, v. 5, n. 3/4, p. 255-280, 2011.
LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. D.; CLAVER-CORTÉS, E.; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J. F. Evaluating environmental regulation in Spain using process control and preventive techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 2 n. 1, p. 497-518, 2009.
LUNDGREN, T.; MARKLUND, P.-O. Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 44, p. 225-235, 2015.
MAÇANEIRO, M. B.; CUNHA, S. K. da; KUHL, M. R.; CUNHA, J. C. da. A regulamentação ambiental conduzindo estratégias ecoinovativas na indústria de papel e celulose. Revista de Administração Contemporânea – RAC, v. 19, n. 1, p. 65-83, jan./fev., 2015.
MANAGI, S.; OPALUCH, J. J.; DI, J.; GRIGALUNAS, T. A. Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. Land Economics, v. 81, n. 2, p. 303-319, 2005.
MOHR, R. D. Technical change, external economies, and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, n. 43, p. 158-168, 2002.
MOHR, R. D.; SAHA, Shrawantee. Distribution of environmental costs and benefits, additional distortions, and the Porter hypothesis. Land Economics, v. 84, n. 4, p. 689-700, nov., 2008.
OBERNDORFER, U.; RENNINGS, K. Costs and competitiveness effects of the European Union emissions trading scheme. European Environment, v. 17, p. 1-17, 2007.
POPP, D. Uncertain R&D and the Porter hypothesis. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, v. 4, n. 1, set., 2005.
PORTER, M. E. America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, v. 264, n. 4, p. 96, april, 1991.
PORTER, M. E.; van der LINDE, C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Jornal of Economic Perspectives, v. 9, n. 4, p. 97-118, 1995.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: testing the Porter hypothesis. Land Economics, v. 96, n. 2, p. 329-344, may, 2010.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. Short-run and long-run implications of environmental regulation on financial performance. Contemporary Economic Policy, v. 29, n. 3, p. 357-373, 2011.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecological Economics, v. 112, p. 129-140, 2015.
RAZUMOVA, M.; IBÁÑEZ, J. L.;REY, J. Drivers of environmental innovation in Majorca hotels. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, v. 23, n. 10, p. 1529-1549, 2015.
RENNINGS, K.; RAMMER, C. The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation sucess and firm performance. Zew -Centre for European Economic Research Discussion, n. 10-065, p. 1-34, 2010.
RUBASHKINA, Y.; GALEOTTI, M.; VERDOLINI, E.. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from european manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, v. 83, p. 288-300, 2015.
SADEGHZADEH, J. The impact of environmental policies on productivity and market competition. Environment and Development Economics, v. 19, n. 5, 2014.
SCHLUGA, T. R. Some micro-evidence on the “Porter hypothesis” from Austrian VOC emission standards. Growth and Change, v. 34, n. 3, p. 359-379, 2003.
SMITH, V. K.; AYERBE, C. Do Painless Environmental Policies Exist? Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, v. 73, p. 73-94, 2000.
STELLA, B.; AGGREY, N.; ESEZA, K. Firm size and rate of growth of Ugandan manufacturing firms. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, v. 4, n. 3, p. 178-188, 2014.
TACHIZAWA, T. Gestão ambiental e responsabilidade social corporativa: estratégias de negócios focadas na realidade brasileira. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
TRIEBSWETTER, U.; WACKERBAUER, J. Integrated environmental product innovation and impacts on company competitiveness: a case study of the automotive industry in the region of Munich. European Environmental, v. 18, p. 30-44, 2008a.
TRIEBSWETTER, U.; WACKERBAUER, J. Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, p. 1484-1493, 2008b.
VLIST, A. J. van der; WITHAGEN, C.; FOLMER, H. Technical efficiency under alternative environmental regulatory regimes: the case of Dutch horticulture. Ecological Economics, v. 63, n. 1, p. 165-173, 2007.
YANG , X.; YAO, Y. Environmental compliance and firm performance: evidence from China. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 74, n. 3, p. 397-424, 2012.
YANG, C.-H.; TSENG, Y.-H.; CHEN, C.-P. Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, v. 34, p. 514-532, 2012.
ZIESERMER, T. A knowledge-based view of the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental Policy and Governance, v. 23, n. 3, p. 193-208, 2013.
AMBEC, S.; BARLA, P. A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, n. 75, p. 355-360, 2002.
AMBEC, S.; COHEN, M. A.; ELGIE, S.; LANOIE, P. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: con environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Environmental Economics and Policy. v. 7 n. 1 p. 2-22, jan., 2013.
ANDRÉ, F. J.; GONZÁLEZ P.; PORTEIRO, N. Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 57, p. 182-194, 2009.
ANSANELLI, S. L. de M. Exigências ambientais europeias: novos desafios competitivos para o complexo eletrônico brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 10, n. 1, jan./jun., 2011.
ANTONIOLI, D.; MANCINELLI, S.; MAZZANTI, M. Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organizational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, v. 42, p. 975-988, 2013.
AQUINO, S. R. F. de; CAVALHEIRO, L. P. R.; PELLENZ, M. A tutela jurídica da água no Brasil: reflexões a partir dos direitos da natureza. Revista de Direito Brasileira – RDB, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 6, p. 65-79, maio/ago., 2016.
ASHFORD, N. A. Na innovation-based strategy for a sustainable environment. In: J. Hemmelskamp, K. Rennings, F. Leone (org.). Innovation-oriented environmental regulation: theoretical approach and empirical analysis. New York: ZEW Economic Studies, 2000, p. 67-107.
BATES, T.; ROBB, A. Analysis of young neighnorhood firms serving urban minority clients. Journal of Economics and Business, v. 60, p. 139-148, 2008.
BERNARD, S. Remanufacturing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 62, n. 3, p. 337-351, 2011.
BRÄNNLUND, R.; LUNDGREN, T. Environmental policy and profitability: evidence from Swedish industry. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, v. 12, p. 59-79, 2010.
BROBERG, T.; MARKLUND, Per-Olov; SAMAKOVLIS, E.; HAMMAR, H. Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 40, p. 43-56, jan., 2013.
BURNETT, R. D.; HANSEN, D. R.; QUINTANA, O. Eco-efficiency: achieving productivity improvements through environmental cost management. Accounting and the Public Interest, v. 7, n. 1, p. 66-92, 2007.
CALIENDO, P.; MUNIZ, V. Política fiscal e desenvolvimento tecnológico-empresarial: uma análise crítica sobre inovação e tributação. Revista de Direito Brasileira – RDB, São Paulo, v.12, n. 5, p. 155-172, 2015.
CERIN, P. Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: a discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, v. 56, p. 209-225, 2006.
COLLINS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
CONNELLY, J.; LIMPAPHAYOM, P. Environmental reporting and firm performance: evidence from Thailand. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, v. 13, p. 137-149, 2004.
COSTANTINI, V.; CRESPI, F. Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics, v. 68, p. 447-460, 2008.
COSTANTINI, V.; MAZZANTI, M. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, v. 41, n.1, p. 132-153, 2012.
DOGANAY, S. M.; SAYED, S.; TASKIN, F. Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering? Energy Economics, v. 44, p. 340-349, 2014.
FEICHTINGER, G.; HARTL, R. F.; KORT, P. M.; VELIOV, V. M. Environmental policy, the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: effects of learning and technological progress. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 50, p. 434-446, 2005.
FORD, J. A.; STEEN, J.; VERREYNNE, M.-L. How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 84, p. 204-2013, 2014.
FRANCKX, L. Regulatory emission limits for cars and the Porter Hypothesis: a survey of the literature. Transport Reviews, v. 35, n. 6, p. 746-766, 2015.
FROHWEIN, T.; HANSJÜRGENS, B. Chemicals regulation and the Porter hypothesis: a critical review of the new European chemicals regulation. Journal of Business Chemistry, v. 2, n. 1, p. 19-36, jan., 2005.
GILL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
GREAKER, M. Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 52, p. 411-420, 2006.
GROBA, F. Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the Porter Hypothesis? Applied Economics, v. 46, n. 5, p. 503-526, 2014.
HAMAMOTO, M. Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, v. 28, p. 299-312, 2006.
HORBACH, J. Determinants of environmental innovation - new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, v. 37, n.1, p. 163-173, 2008.
HORVÁTHOVÁ, E. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: short-term costs and long-term benefits. Ecological Economics, v. 84, p. 91-97, 2012.
INOUE, E.; ARIMURA, T. H.; NAKANO, M. A new insight into environmental innovation: does the maturity of environmental management systems matter? Ecological Economics, v. 94, p. 156-163, 2013.
JAFFE, A.B.; PALMER, K. Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Economics and Statistics, v. 79, p. 610-619, 1997.
KATARIA, M. The role of preferences in disagreements over scientific hypothesis: evidence on cognitive bias in formation of beliefs. The Journal of Socio-Economics, v. 41, n. 4, p. 364-369, 2012.
KÓZLUK, T.; ZIPPERER, V. Environmental policies and productivity growth – a critical review of empirical findings. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, v. 88, p. 1-37, nov., 2013.
KRIECHEL, B.; ZIESEMER, T. The environmental Porter Hypothesis: theory, evidence and a model of timing of adoption. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, v. 18, n.3, p. 267-294, 2009.
LANOIE, P.; PATRY, M.; LAJEUNESSE, R. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Poductivity Analysis, v. 30, p. 121-128, 2008.
LANOIE, P.; LAURENT-LUCCHETI, J.; JOHNSTONE, N.; AMBEC, S. Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 803-842, 2011.
LIM, S.; PRAKASH, A. Voluntary regulations and innovation: the case of ISO 14001. Public Administration Review, v. 74, n. 2, p. 233-244, 2014.
LINDMARK, M.; BERGQUIST, A. K. Expansion for pollution reduction? Environmental adaptation of a Swedish and a Canadian metal smelter, 1960-2005. Business History, v. 50, n. 4, p. 530-546, 2008.
LIU, X.; DAI, H.; CHENG, P. Drivers of integrated environmental innovation and impact on company competitiveness: evidence from 18 Chinese firms. Journal of Technology and Globalisation, v. 5, n. 3/4, p. 255-280, 2011.
LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. D.; CLAVER-CORTÉS, E.; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J. F. Evaluating environmental regulation in Spain using process control and preventive techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 2 n. 1, p. 497-518, 2009.
LUNDGREN, T.; MARKLUND, P.-O. Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 44, p. 225-235, 2015.
MAÇANEIRO, M. B.; CUNHA, S. K. da; KUHL, M. R.; CUNHA, J. C. da. A regulamentação ambiental conduzindo estratégias ecoinovativas na indústria de papel e celulose. Revista de Administração Contemporânea – RAC, v. 19, n. 1, p. 65-83, jan./fev., 2015.
MANAGI, S.; OPALUCH, J. J.; DI, J.; GRIGALUNAS, T. A. Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. Land Economics, v. 81, n. 2, p. 303-319, 2005.
MOHR, R. D. Technical change, external economies, and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, n. 43, p. 158-168, 2002.
MOHR, R. D.; SAHA, Shrawantee. Distribution of environmental costs and benefits, additional distortions, and the Porter hypothesis. Land Economics, v. 84, n. 4, p. 689-700, nov., 2008.
OBERNDORFER, U.; RENNINGS, K. Costs and competitiveness effects of the European Union emissions trading scheme. European Environment, v. 17, p. 1-17, 2007.
POPP, D. Uncertain R&D and the Porter hypothesis. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, v. 4, n. 1, set., 2005.
PORTER, M. E. America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, v. 264, n. 4, p. 96, april, 1991.
PORTER, M. E.; van der LINDE, C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Jornal of Economic Perspectives, v. 9, n. 4, p. 97-118, 1995.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. The effect of clean water regulation on profitability: testing the Porter hypothesis. Land Economics, v. 96, n. 2, p. 329-344, may, 2010.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. Short-run and long-run implications of environmental regulation on financial performance. Contemporary Economic Policy, v. 29, n. 3, p. 357-373, 2011.
RASSIER, D. G.; EARNHART, D. Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecological Economics, v. 112, p. 129-140, 2015.
RAZUMOVA, M.; IBÁÑEZ, J. L.;REY, J. Drivers of environmental innovation in Majorca hotels. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, v. 23, n. 10, p. 1529-1549, 2015.
RENNINGS, K.; RAMMER, C. The impact of regulation-driven environmental innovation on innovation sucess and firm performance. Zew -Centre for European Economic Research Discussion, n. 10-065, p. 1-34, 2010.
RUBASHKINA, Y.; GALEOTTI, M.; VERDOLINI, E.. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from european manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, v. 83, p. 288-300, 2015.
SADEGHZADEH, J. The impact of environmental policies on productivity and market competition. Environment and Development Economics, v. 19, n. 5, 2014.
SCHLUGA, T. R. Some micro-evidence on the “Porter hypothesis” from Austrian VOC emission standards. Growth and Change, v. 34, n. 3, p. 359-379, 2003.
SMITH, V. K.; AYERBE, C. Do Painless Environmental Policies Exist? Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, v. 73, p. 73-94, 2000.
STELLA, B.; AGGREY, N.; ESEZA, K. Firm size and rate of growth of Ugandan manufacturing firms. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, v. 4, n. 3, p. 178-188, 2014.
TACHIZAWA, T. Gestão ambiental e responsabilidade social corporativa: estratégias de negócios focadas na realidade brasileira. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
TRIEBSWETTER, U.; WACKERBAUER, J. Integrated environmental product innovation and impacts on company competitiveness: a case study of the automotive industry in the region of Munich. European Environmental, v. 18, p. 30-44, 2008a.
TRIEBSWETTER, U.; WACKERBAUER, J. Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, p. 1484-1493, 2008b.
VLIST, A. J. van der; WITHAGEN, C.; FOLMER, H. Technical efficiency under alternative environmental regulatory regimes: the case of Dutch horticulture. Ecological Economics, v. 63, n. 1, p. 165-173, 2007.
YANG , X.; YAO, Y. Environmental compliance and firm performance: evidence from China. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 74, n. 3, p. 397-424, 2012.
YANG, C.-H.; TSENG, Y.-H.; CHEN, C.-P. Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, v. 34, p. 514-532, 2012.
ZIESERMER, T. A knowledge-based view of the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental Policy and Governance, v. 23, n. 3, p. 193-208, 2013.