Different Methods of Conflict Resolution and Graduation in Law: Analysis from Grades of Curriculum Course Graduation in Right in Sergipe

Abstract

This work has as object of study the different methods of conflict resolution and its impact on education legal, especially in undergraduate courses in law in Sergipe. The relevance of the subject is revealed both in the theoretical field and in pragmatic. It starts with the analysis of the principle of access to justice, its historical evolution and current concept. The basic idea of the study is to reflect whether and to what extent the study of different methods of resolving conflicts in law in undergraduate programs impact the legal culture and in particular the realization of the principle of access to justice. For this, the analysis is done from doctrinal teachings on the aforementioned principle and its consequences both using the traditional method, jurisdictional litigation, dispute resolution, as with alternative methods. The curricula of law in undergraduate courses are analyzed in Sergipe, completed by the little importance given to the subject by most higher state educational institutions. At the end, it is proposed as a need for implementation of the principle of access to justice, the change in approach to the subject in undergraduate courses. This study, in this respect, contributes a new vision of the subject, it can be adopted in higher education institutions and more consistent with the National Curriculum Guidelines for the undergraduate degree in law.