ARBITRIUM EX MÁQUINA: UMA ABORDAGEM DE REGULAÇÃO RESPONSIVA À SOLUÇÃO DE CONTROVÉRSIAS EM PLATAFORMAS DIGITAIS.
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ALBORNOZ, María M. Martín, Núrua G. Feasibility Analysis of Online Dispute Resolution in Developing Countries, em The University of Miami Inter-american Law Review, Miami, v. 44. 2012.
ARESTY, Jeff et al Expand Your Practice with Online Dispute Resolution Technology, GPSolo, v. 32, n. 1, 2015.
BALDWIN, Robert; BLACK, Julia. Really Responsive Regulation. The modern law review, v71, n. 1, 2008
BRAITHWAITE, John. Types of responsiveness, Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications. Peter Drahos, 2010
BRETT, Jeanne M. et al Sticks and Stones: Language, Face, and Online Dispute Resolution, The Academy of Management Journal, v. 50 n. 1, 2007
GUERRA, Sérgio. Regulação Estatal e Novas Tecnologias, Interesse Público, v. 100, 2016.
HARRIS, Nathan. Does Responsive Regulation Offer an Alternative? Questioning the Role of Formalistic Assessment in Child Protection Investigations, The British Journal of Social Work, v. 41, n.7, 2011
JEKER, Virginia La Torre. et al E-Transaction Law and Online Dispute Resolution: A Necessity in the Middle East, Arab Law Quarterly, v. 20, n.1 2006
KADRI, Thomas, E. Digital Gatekeepers. Texas Law Rev. V.99, 2020
LEVI-FAUR, David. The Political Economy of Legal Globalization: Juridification, Adversarial Legalism, and Responsive Regulation. A Comment. International Organization, 2005, v 59, n.2
LOO, Rory, V. Federal Rules of Platform Procedure. University of chicaco Law Rev., 2020
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-012X/2021.v7i1.7657
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Brasileira de Filosofia do Direito, Florianópolis (SC), e-ISSN: 2526-012X
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.