Published: 2017-02-15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1479
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1480
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1482
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1485
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1486
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1494
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1496
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1498

Access to Justice: The Search for Effectiveness of Procedure

Márcia Haydée Porto de Carvalho, Maria José Carvalho de Sousa Milhomem

852 - 871

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1499
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1500
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-026X/2016.v2i2.1765